You are here: Central Valley Home / California Aqueduct
California Aqueduct: Evaluation of Groundwater Conditions and
Land Subsidence Along the California Aqueduct
Groundwater and the California Aqueduct
There are concerns that fluctuating land-surface elevations
due to subsidence and uplift in the valley could cause serious
operational-maintenance and design construction problems for
the California Aqueduct surface-water delivery system. As a
result, the USGS has undertaken this study to develop a greater
understanding of the location, extent, and magnitude of
subsidence along the California Aqueduct, as well as to help
understand the relationship of groundwater levels and land
subsidence. By providing new tools to better understand the
availability and sustainability of water resources, this study
will aid State Water Contractors in better managing water
resources, minimizing the impacts of land subsidence, and
efficiently managing the California water conveyance
systems.
Land Subsidence Along the California Aqueduct
-
Background
The San Joaquin Valley is one of the most
productive agricultural regions in the nation.
Beginning around the 1920's farmers relied upon
groundwater for water supply. Over time,
overpumping caused groundwater-level declines
and associated aquifer-system compaction and
land subsidence that resulted in permanent
aquifer-system storage loss. By 1970,
significant land subsidence (more than one
foot) had occurred in about half of the San
Joaquin Valley, or about 5,200 square miles
(Poland and others, 1975), and
locally, some areas had subsided by as much as
28 feet.
Surface-water imports via the California
Aqueduct in the late 1960's and early 1970's,
and the associated decrease in groundwater
pumping, resulted in a steady recovery of water
levels and a reduced rate of compaction. During
the droughts of 1976-77, 1987-92, and 2007-09,
diminished deliveries of imported water
prompted increased groundwater pumping to meet
irrigation demands. This increased pumping
resulted in water-level declines reaching near
historic lows and periods of renewed
compaction. Following each of these droughts,
recovery to pre-drought water levels was rapid
and compaction virtually ceased.
-
Land Subsidence
Historically, land subsidence in the San
Joaquin Valley has been measured by repeat land
surveys and by recording compaction at
extensometers at specific locations in the
valley over time. Recently, several
continuously measured Global Positioning System
(GPS) sites have been installed in the valley
that provide a continuous measurement of land
subsidence at specific locations (see map
above). Each of these techniques is relatively
expensive and does not provide detailed spatial
resolution of the extent and magnitude of land
subsidence. GPS surveying could be used to
measure the areal distribution of land
subsidence; however, the technique relies on
field surveys that are time consuming and
expensive.
InSAR methods can provide spatially detailed
maps (interferograms) of changes in
land-surface elevations. The resolution of the
vertical displacement of land surface
measurable by InSAR techniques can be as high
as about 5 mm; whereas, the expected vertical
resolution of geodetic surveying techniques is
lower, about 20 mm or more. The spatial
resolution of InSAR is orders of magnitude
higher than any economical terrestrial methods.
However, results of previous studies indicate
that conventional InSAR methods are not ideal
for large areas of the valley because
agricultural land use disturbs the ground
surface and causes decorrelation of the
processed image, which cannot be readily
interpreted (Brandt and others,
2005). However, the more
recently-developed persistent scatterer
technique may improve the results in these
areas. The persistent scatterer InSAR technique
algorithmically detects and selects points or
targets (persistent scatterers) based on
spectral and intensity properties, then
computes interferograms for those points only,
which greatly reduces decorrelation
(Werner and others, 2003; Hoffmann and
others, 2005; Strozz and others, 2005).
If enough persistent scatterers, such as
buildings, roads, and other structures are
identified, this technique may enable detection
and measurement of land subsidence for the
considerably large study area. For such large
areas, using other techniques to measure land
subsidence, such as spirit leveling or GPS
would be prohibitively expensive, and would not
provide the spatial or temporal detail possible
with InSAR. The persistent scatterer technique
may provide a temporally and spatially dense
time series of land subsidence for periods
during 2003-10. This new monitoring method may
provide managers with the subsidence
information needed to manage the water
conveyance systems.
-
Relationship of Groundwater Levels and Land
Subsidence
Groundwater-level data for 2003-10 was
obtained from the California Department of
Water Resources (DWR), Westlands Water District
and USGS databases to assess the relationship
of groundwater levels to land-surface-elevation
changes for 2003-10. Locations of wells will be
compared to locations of subsidence and changes
in groundwater levels will be compared with
changes in land-surface elevations.
Two continuous GPS sites are currently in
operation in the northern part of the Westlands
area (see map above). Data from these
continuous GPS sites will provide information
on the time history of land-surface elevation
change. A continuously operating pressure
transducer was installed in an existing well
near one of the continuous GPS sites to provide
information on water-level changes near a known
area of subsidence. The continuous GPS and
water-level data can then be used for
stress-strain analysis (subject to data
availability). If water levels fluctuate in the
elastic range of stress, the elastic storage
coefficient will be computed. The elastic
storage coefficient is a standard measure of
aquifer storage and governs the recoverable
(reversible) deformation of the aquifer system.
If water levels continue to decline beyond
historically low levels (the inelastic range of
stress), it may be possible to compute the
inelastic storage coefficient that governs the
persistent compaction of the aquifer system. If
water levels are fluctuating in both ranges of
stress (fluctuating seasonally and declining
annually), both the elastic and inelastic
storage coefficients could be computed. All
water-level data collected for this study will
be stored in the USGS database (National Water
Information System).