Hydrologic Treatments Affect Gaseous Carbon Losses From Organic Soils,
Twitchell Island, California, October 1995 - December 1997
By Robin L. Miller, Lauren L. Hastings, and Roger Fujii
U.S. Geological Survey
Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4042
Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources
Sacramento, California 2000
- Executive Summary
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods and Materials
- Site Description and Study Design
- Measurement of Gaseous Carbon Emissions
- Measurement of Plant Carbon Inputs
- Statistical Analysis
- Results
- Gaseous Carbon Emissions
- Plant Carbon Inputs
- Discussion
- Study Limitations
- Summary
- References
- FIGURES
- 1. Map showing location of the study site, Twitchell Island, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
- 2. Schematic showing enlargement of study site, Twitchell Island, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
- 3. Sketch showing vented static chamber with base used for collecting gaseous carbon emissions
- 4 - 12. Graphs showing:
- 4. Mean gaseous carbon emissions from the four hydrologic treatments of organic soils on Twitchell
Island, October 1995 to December 1997, as methane, carbon dioxide, and total gaseous carbon
(carbon dioxide and methane)
- 5. Mean monthly total gaseous carbon emissions from the four hydrologic treatments of organic
soils on Twitchell Island, October 1995 to December 1997
- 6. Mean monthly carbon dioxide emissions from the four hydrologic treatments of organic
soils on Twitchell Island, October 1995 to December 1997
- 7. Mean monthly methane emissions from the four hydrologic treatments of organic
soils on Twitchell Island, October 1995 to December 1997
- 8. Mean soil and air temperatures of the four hydrologic treatments of organic
soils on Twitchell Island, October 1995 to December 1997
- 9. Mean monthly soil temperature, at 10-cm depth, from the four hydrologic treatments of organic
soils on Twitchell Island, October 1995 to December 1997
- 10. Mean monthly air temperature from chambers in the four hydrologic treatments of organic
soils on Twitchell Island, October 1995 to December 1997
- 11. Mean above- and below-ground plant biomass for the reverse flooding and the permanent shallow
flooding treatments of organic soils on Twitchell Island during the 1997 growing season
- 12. Mean above-ground plant biomass, depicted by plant type, from the reverse flooding treatment
of organic soils on Twitchell Island during the 1997 growing season
- 13. Mean total leaf length and mean standing live leaf length of Typha spp.
In the reverse flooding and permanent shallow flooding treatments of
organic soils on Twitchell Island, 1997
- TABLES
- 1. Multiple regression model statistics for methane flux against soil and
air temperature, soil moisture and water depth, including model
significance and r2, and significant explanatory variables with r2
- 2. Multiple regression model statistics for carbon dioxide flux against
soil and air temperature, soil moisture and water depth, including
model significance and r2, and significant explanatory variables with r2
- 3. Mean biomass measurements from monthly harvests in 1997 for the reverse
flooding and permanent shallow flooding treatments and statistical comparisons
Abstract
Subsidence of organic soils in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, has
increased the potential for levee failure and flooding in the region. Because
oxidation of the peat soils is a primary cause of subsidence, reversion of
affected lands to wetlands has been proposed as a mitigation tool. To test this
hypothesis, three 10 x 10 meter enclosures were built on Twitchell Island in the
Delta and managed as different wetland habitats. Emissions of carbon dioxide and
methane were measured in situ from October 1995 through December 1997, from the
systems that developed under the different water-management treatments.
Treatments included a seasonal control (SC) under current island management
conditions; reverse flooding (RF), where the land is intentionally flooded from
early dry season until midsummer; permanent shallow flooding (F); and a more
deeply flooded, open-water (OW) treatment.
Hydrologic treatments affected microbial processes, plant community and
temperature dynamics which, in turn, affected carbon cycling. Water-management
treatments with a period of flooding significantly decreased gaseous carbon
emissions compared to the seasonal control. Permanent flooding treatments showed
significantly higher methane fluxes than treatments with some period of aerobic
conditions. Shallow flooding treatments created conditions that support cattail
[Typha species (spp.)] marshes, while deep flooding precluded emergent
vegetation. Carbon inputs to the permanent shallow flooding treatment tended to
be greater than the measured losses. This suggests that permanent shallow
flooding has the greatest potential for managing subsidence of these soils by
generating organic substrate more rapidly than is lost through decomposition.
Carbon input estimates of plant biomass compared to measurements of gaseous
carbon losses indicate the potential for mitigation of subsidence through
hydrologic management of the organic soils in the area.
Water Resources of California
URL:http://ca.water.usgs.gov/rep/wrir004042/
Contact:
webmaster@maildcascr.wr.usgs.gov
Last modified: Wed Jun 07 10:29:10 2000